January 3, 2010

Sales Tax – How Much is 10% Down

Now that's we've looked at the tax structure of Neosho, we can start to understand what it means when revenues are up or down during a certain period.  As a refresher, Neosho operates primarily off of a sales-tax revenue base.  The city’s tax rate is 2.5% on retail sales and is a portion of the 7.6% sales tax rate you and I pay on most things we buy in Neosho.

Retail Base

By doing some simple math from the budget, the 2.5% sales tax backs into a taxable retail base of roughly $200 million annually.  That means that between Wal-Mart, Lowe's, and every other business that sells products, food, etc. in Neosho, they collectively sell around $200 million worth of ‘stuff’ every year.

So with those numbers, we can now say that Neosho will collect around $5 million in sales tax this fiscal year ($200 million x 2.5%).  That sales tax goes to pay for everything from light bulbs to bridges, from payroll to pavement, and everything in between.  As listed in the previous blog posting, there are a number of different taxes that add up to the 2.5% total.  Each tax should be accounted for in the books of the city and, typically, cannot be mixed with other taxes or used for purposes other than their statutory description.  (That means that taxes collected for fire protection should not be used for parks and recreation, etc.)

What a Percentage Decline Means in $$

So during times of economic slowdown like we are living through right now, the paycheck the city receives from tax payers (in the form of sales tax revenue) is lower.  If our revenue expectations are down 10%, that number approximates a $500,000 reduction in city sales tax revenues annually. 

And since things like debt payments (which Neosho pays around $1.5 million annually) can’t be cut in the short run, it’s not as simple as just cutting expenses across the board.  Some expenses cannot be cut (banks won’t accept lower payments on debt just because taxes are down) and others areas wind up taking a larger cut to balance a reduction in revenues.

If a city had a blend of sales and property tax, the impact of slower retail sales may be lessened since property taxes don’t typically see the same volatile swings.  That’s a reason I would recommend the city, as some point, look into a blended tax base.  That option falls outside the scope of this discussion.

It’s also important for cities to keep a 2-3 financial reserve in place to help offset the effects of a temporary slowdown in retail sales.  Neosho did not have this level of reserve in place.  That will need to be addressed in the future.

Summary

So now that we’ve looked at revenue sources and some rough numbers on annual revenues, I hope you have a clearer understanding of why any city with a sales-tax-based revenue stream suffers more during a time of economic slowdown.  And without sufficient reserves in place to handle these slow downs, that leads to pay cuts, layoffs, and a number of other issues that we are all living with today.

Next time, we’ll take a look at some sizable capital projects that have occurred over the past few years.  Those include renovations of the Civic/Senior Center, Howard Bush Drive Extension, South Street Overpass, and La-Z-Boy drive.  Specifically, we’ll look at how these projects contributed to the cash-flow problems we’re seeing today.

Until next time…stay warm!

10 comments:

  1. Mr. Davidson, I don't think you're going to find many takers of your desire to give the city more money. Some of us worked tonight to find the mayor's state of the union message from last year. I give you a sample:

    "What shape are we in financially? Are we going to be okay if economic conditions worsen? Can we continue to prosper in tough times? The City of Neosho's answers to those questions, this evening, is yes, yes, and yes. Because our city government oprates in the black, and earnestly strives to make prudent financial decisions, we believe we can survive a more severe economic downturn. This is not to say, or imply, that everything looks great, and we will not be facing some tough decision that will be made may have some unpleasant, but necessary, consequences. The task of the City Council and Administration is to be good stewards of the taxpayers' money. Everyone in city government has a laser focus on how your money is spent. That was true yesterday, it is true today, and it will be true tomorrow. Our operating budget is structured to allow the council and management to readily identify areas of concern, and adjust spending levels quickly and appropriately..."

    Need I say more?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anon:

    I wasn't asking for any money. And I was in attendance during the state of the city last year. I remember those words. Seems a little different from today's reality.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Are you going to tell your readers that you will not support the movement to institute a property tax? Please make that public if you would.

    And if a property tax is promoted, will you support asking the city to guarantee that EVERY property will carry a fair share...that no property will be exempt because of something like "it's in an enterprise zone," or because a large company figures out a way to place the property onto some "not-for-profit" list...or there is some trade off to "keep jobs." Many have no faith in how taxes are assessed, with the big guys getting the breaks and freebies while the homeowners get the bill....

    All this, I fear, is part of that failing trust we have in men and women who are ambitious to be "city leaders," and whose interests they really look out for.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I've said a number of times on this blog and in public that I DO support the city having a blended tax base of both sales tax and property tax.

    As to guaranteeing every property owner pays, properties in Neosho are already assessed by the county. That's not a city function. Any property tax imposed by the city would be based on that valuation. Without a doubt, there are exemptions and other benefits some get to reduce property taxes. But as a whole, commercial/industrial businesses pay the largest % of property taxes...not individuals.

    ReplyDelete
  5. commercial/industrial business also have the largest % of property values - far above homeowners....just listen to what is being said about the price of the two abandoned car dealership buildings...one of them is valued at more than all the houses on my street...

    I don't understand your argument there...and it's those "exemptions and other benefits" that I oppose

    ReplyDelete
  6. If you don't like the "exemptions and other benefits", I'd start by calling your state and federal elected officials. Those benefits are created by the state and/or federal gov't as part of helping businesses. Both parties (Dems and Repubs) do it. It's nothing new. That's a bigger picture issue of how businesses choose where to locate. If they can save money by coming to Neosho vs. Pittsburg, or MO vs OK, creating jobs is a good thing. But it does have to be done responsibly.

    If you read my prior posts, I've given my reasons. If we don't agree, we don't agree. But we have costs in Neosho associated with business (big fire trucks, industrial road maintenance, etc.) Having industry in Neosho pay a portion of the costs is something I think is fair and is something a property tax does do. I'm not knocking a sales tax - heck, I love people to come from Anderson and Seneca to shop and pay taxes that I benefit from, but I like the property tax component as well.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Anon,
    I see your argument for a "fair" property tax (if there HAS to be a property tax at all). I see you are part of a movement who does not believe in giving "breaks" for jobs or other community benefits. I encourage you to explore kansascity.com and read about the more than 10,000 jobs lost on the Missouri Side of Kansas City, due to the State of Kansas offering better "incentives" to corporations. My point is this - Missouri has lost the ability to have income taxes on these 10,000 jobs and it has lost the property tax base that would have come with the huge facilities supporting these jobs. Missouri schools will suffer.

    We must not hide our head in the sand and because of poor judgment by our City Manager - kill our ability to recruit better jobs to this area. Neosho was long the pride of Missouri in retaining jobs and taking care of large employers, so we could all benefit by having lower individual property taxes.

    You are correct in your assertion that large businesses have more valuable property, but they also provide a lively hood to many of us. Without La Z Boy, Scholastic, Jarden, Nutra Blend, Missouri Sugars, Premier Turbines, etc. - where would Neosho be?

    If we follow the route proposed by some in our area and do away with the economic development tax and we stop giving these "breaks" to current and prospective employers - I promise you - I guarantee you - There is a county or City in Tennessee, Arkansas, Kansas, etc - who would love to cut taxes to assure their citizens a place to work.

    Be careful what you ask for - you just might get it.

    Steve Douglas

    ReplyDelete
  8. Steve - Since I don't do the wheeling and dealing in this town, I cannot quote book, chapter and verse on all the "economic" activity. I don't suggest to know all the ins and outs, but I do have my eyes and ears open to many things and I study matters such as this as best I can. There is nothing wrong with providing incentives to entice a company to your community. But, that said, it boils down to how big the enticements and how soon the "pay back."
    Consider the company that is given a five-year incentive, meaning they don't pay their share of things for five years but then must pick up part of the load. So often, this company does really well for four-and-one-half years and then they leave town...and what about the companies that threatens to leave town without more incentives such as free water, etc. The city gives in for him while the guy across the street gets nothing.
    how many tax dollars have been spent cleaning up after companies that left town and also left an environmental mess or an eyesore to clean up?
    Do we need places of employment in Neosho? You betcha we do, but at what cost to give them the keys to the city, providing fire and police and street and utilties and other benefits while those who provide the money (the taxpayers) suffer for lack of services..better a small, well-maintained community proud of itself than a sprawling, disjointed crumbling little city...

    Be careful what you ask for - you just might get it.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Would you consider this a good "incentive" investment?

    "Little more than a year after cutting the ribbon at a new factory in Devens built with more than $58 million in state aid, Evergreen Solar today said it will shift its assembly of solar panels from there to China.

    In exchange for Receiving $58.6 million ingrants, loans, land, tax incentives and other aid to build in Massachusetts, Evergreen pledged it would add 350 new jobs, a goal that it has, to date, far surpassed. However, the company disclosed in a financial filing today that it would write off $40 million worth of equipment at Devens because of the production shift to China.

    The company has been a poster child of the Patrick administration's efforts to develope a "green energy" industry cluster in Massachusetts. It recently persuaded the state to lend it another $5 million to cover equipment purchases, though the state has not yet released the funds."

    There is more to this story from both sides of the issue, and I encourage everyone to find this on the internet and read it all...

    Like I said, it's those "exemptions and other benfits" that drive me up a wall!

    ReplyDelete
  10. Hello Mr. Davidson,
    I have enjoyed your “Boulevard Blog” very much. Thanks for the entertaining and informative script, however, you have stated in your blog; “I support the property tax issue for a number of reasons…” and “My ideas are not new. They simply represent a common-sense approach to working through this financial crisis. Some things can happen quickly. Others will take many months if not years to fully implement. But without a fix and a solution, the future of Neosho will remain uncertain”. I am one of many who do not support the property tax. I feel your views do not “simply represent a common-sense approach”. As one of many examples, common-sense would not have allowed $.25- million (above insurance pay-out) to be spent on a City Hall building remodel. As a member of the Neosho City Council you will share the accountability of our city officer’s actions, and with their track record, common-sense on an issue as serious as another tax increase can not be trusted to our current administration, change is overdue. My core values are conservative and I am no longer tolerant of the incompetent and expensive decisions of our city officers, however, I share the responsibility due to my inactivity to date.
    I’ll be looking forward to meeting you in person.
    Revolution

    ReplyDelete

All comments are moderated before being posted. Postings are at the sole discretion of the blog moderator. Anonymous postings are no longer allowed. I encourage your comments, but put you name on the bottom line!